You are here:
Bartholomew Versus the Wheel

Bartholomew Versus the Wheel

1964

Director

Robert McKimson

Runtime

6 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The story of Bartholomew, a dog who hates wheels, as he grows from a puppy to a very large dog.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.5/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses entirely on a canine protagonist's aversion to wheels. There are no visible queer narratives or non-cisnormative identities present.

Gender Representation

Fair

The protagonist's gender remains neutral within the narrative. The story follows a standard biological progression without challenging or reinforcing specific gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The story utilizes anthropomorphic animals rather than human characters. There is no evidence of intentional racial or ethnic representation through these species.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The plot follows a conventional, linear growth arc. It lacks any critique of Western institutions, religion, or complex cultural frameworks.

Disability Representation

Minimal

Bartholomew's fear of wheels could be viewed as a psychological phobia. However, it is unclear if this is treated with agency or used as a gag.

Strengths

  • The film offers a clear, character-driven narrative arc following a protagonist's growth.
  • It utilizes a focused, singular comedic premise centered on a specific character aversion.

Areas for Improvement

  • The lack of an ensemble cast prevents diverse character interactions.
  • The narrative lacks social or systemic critique, focusing instead on individual slapstick.
  • There is no evidence of representation for various identities or cultural frameworks.

AI Analysis

This mid-century animated short is a character-driven vignette centered on a singular anthropomorphic protagonist. The narrative follows a simple developmental arc from puppyhood to adulthood, driven by a specific phobia. The film lacks an ensemble cast or diverse character archetypes, which limits its capacity for intersectional storytelling. It adheres to the traditional comedic tropes of the Golden Age of animation. Because the focus remains on a personal struggle against an inanimate object, the work lacks systemic critique or social commentary. It functions as a standard, non-intersectional comedic short.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.