New Showbiz

You are here:
Living Proof

Living Proof

2017

Director

Matt Embry

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, documentarian Matt Embry takes viewers on a transnational journey — from Italy to Canada, and from the lab to the home — in order to examine the politics of the condition.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.7/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. Its focus remains strictly on medical and personal experiences rather than queer identity.

Gender Representation

Fair

Gender dynamics are not explicitly detailed. The documentary maintains a neutral stance without evidence of subverting traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

While the journey spans Italy and Canada, there is no evidence of diverse racial composition or non-Anglo-Saxon perspectives.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film critiques medical institutions and the politics of health management. This suggests a questioning of established institutional authority.

Disability Representation

Good

The film grants significant agency to the individual with MS. It avoids passive tropes by positioning the disabled person as the primary investigator.

Strengths

  • Provides high agency to the individual living with a disability.
  • Avoids the 'passive recipient' trope by centering lived expertise.
  • Explores the complex politics and systemic management of medical conditions.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks intersectional markers such as LGBTQ+ or diverse racial representation.
  • Does not explicitly address gendered power imbalances or hierarchies.
  • Focus remains narrow on a single biographical experience rather than broad social critique.

AI Analysis

Living Proof excels in disability representation by centering the lived expertise of the individual. By making the person with MS the driver of the narrative, the film avoids common tropes of passivity in medical storytelling. However, the film lacks broader intersectional depth. It does not feature significant LGBTQ+ narratives or diverse racial perspectives, keeping the scope narrow. Ultimately, the documentary functions as a specialized biographical study. It provides a strong platform for physical disability but lacks the social breadth to address wider systemic hierarchies.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for My Flesh and Blood

My Flesh and Blood

2003

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.