You are here:

Freak Power: The Ballot or the Bomb

Freak Power: The Ballot or the Bomb

Representation Score

8.7/10

Excellent

2020

R

Director

Ajax Phillips, Daniel Joseph Watkins

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Freak Power: The Ballot or the Bomb serves as a sophisticated historical critique of institutional power. It succeeds by deconstructing traditional hierarchies and centering anti-establishment narratives through archival storytelling. The film's strength lies in its cultural critique and its ability to highlight women and LGBTQ+ individuals within the context of radical social movements. However, the documentary is limited by its historical focus, resulting in lower representation of racial diversity and specific disability-centric narratives.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Freak Power: The Ballot or the Bomb have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film uses archival footage to illustrate how queer liberation movements intersected with radical political activism during a time of social upheaval. It highlights the visibility of non-straight identities within these movements.

How does Freak Power: The Ballot or the Bomb portray gender?

Good

The narrative challenges traditional political archetypes by emphasizing women's roles in strategic influence. It showcases their involvement in grassroots mobilization and environmental movements.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Freak Power: The Ballot or the Bomb?

Fair

The film focuses heavily on the localized struggles of Hunter S. Thompson and specific political landscapes from the 1960s and 1980s. It lacks explicit evidence of actively leading characters of color.

How does Freak Power: The Ballot or the Bomb represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The documentary excels at critiquing Western institutions and capitalism. It frames anti-establishment activism and civil disobedience as necessary tools for political action and systemic disruption.

Does Freak Power: The Ballot or the Bomb include disability representation?

Fair

The film touches on the physical realities of civil unrest but lacks specific narrative drivers regarding neurodivergence or physical disabilities. It prioritizes political identity over disability-centric arcs.

Present on Screen

  • Strong critique of traditional Western institutions and capitalist structures.
  • Effective integration of women in strategic and influential activist roles.
  • Provides visibility to LGBTQ+ identities within historical political movements.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks actively leading characters of color within the historical narrative.
  • Provides limited focus on neurodivergence or physical disability arcs.
  • Reflects the demographic constraints of the specific eras depicted.

Official Synopsis

Hunter S. Thompson went to the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago as a journalist and returned home disgusted, yet motivated by what he’d just seen: violently suppressed protests, riots, corrupt politicians, and abusive cops. Back in Aspen, he finds more of the same. The local police and sheriff’s departments are targeting young people, harassing and charging them with absurd crimes and trying to push them out of town. Hunter decides he has to do something to change the police brutality that has become the norm.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.