You are here:
When We Were Bullies

When We Were Bullies

2021

Director

Jay Rosenblatt

Runtime

36 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A mind-boggling "coincidence" leads the filmmaker to track down his fifth grade class – and fifth grade teacher – to examine their memory of and complicity in a bullying incident fifty years ago.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.3/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Good

Queer identity is integrated into the director's personal developmental arc. The narrative uses queer theory to explore how non-normative identities navigate rigid childhood social structures.

Gender Representation

Good

The film examines the subversion of traditional social hierarchies and adolescent power dynamics. It analyzes how aggression and social status are performed rather than relying on gendered tropes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The narrative centers on a specific, localized social group from the director's past. While it lacks explicit racial intersectionality, it explores themes of outsider status and marginalization.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film prioritizes subjective morality and deconstructs traditional social cohesion. It avoids moralistic binaries, instead studying the psychological impact of anti-social behavior and systemic complicity.

Disability Representation

Fair

The documentary engages with invisible disabilities, specifically neurodivergence and trauma. It focuses on how psychological wounds function as enduring aspects of a person's lived experience.

Strengths

  • Sophisticated integration of queer identity within the director's personal developmental arc.
  • Nuanced exploration of invisible disabilities, specifically neurodivergence and psychological trauma.
  • Challenges traditional moral binaries by focusing on the complexities of complicity and social aggression.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit focus on racial intersectionality or diverse ethnic demographics.
  • The localized focus on a specific social group limits broader racial representation.

AI Analysis

Jay Rosenblatt’s documentary is a sophisticated psychological inquiry that uses personal history to critique social hierarchies. By blending archival reality with stylized reenactments, the film moves beyond traditional retrospective storytelling to explore how early trauma shapes identity. The work excels in its nuanced treatment of queer identity and invisible disabilities. It treats neurodivergence and non-normative identities not as mere biographical details, but as central components in understanding how individuals navigate social aggression. However, the film's focus on a localized social group limits its racial and ethnic breadth. While it effectively uses the concept of the 'outsider' to mirror marginalization, it lacks explicit intersectional depth regarding racial demographics.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.