You are here:

The Tiger Makes Out

The Tiger Makes Out

Representation Score

1.7/10

Minimal

1967

Approved

Director

Arthur Hiller

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Tiger Makes Out serves as a period-specific character study that prioritizes psychological realism over broad demographic representation. It captures the transition toward New Hollywood by deconstructing romantic idealism and exploring urban alienation. While the film avoids the 'happily-ever-after' clichés of earlier eras, it remains constrained by the social norms of 1967. The narrative focuses on a specific, homogeneous social milieu that lacks meaningful racial or LGBTQ+ representation. Ultimately, the film's progressive value lies in its cynical view of human connection rather than its inclusivity. It offers a complex look at interpersonal friction while remaining demographically narrow.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Tiger Makes Out have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film operates within a framework that assumes everyone is straight or cisgender. There is no evidence of same-sex relationships or non-cisgender identities among the main characters.

How does The Tiger Makes Out portray gender?

Fair

The narrative replaces idealized romance with a cynical, psychologically complex dynamic. While the female lead engages in intellectual debates rather than submissive behavior, it falls short of fully challenging power structures.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Tiger Makes Out?

Minimal

The cast is predominantly white and Anglo-Saxon, reflecting the demographic makeup of the mid-century New York intelligentsia. There is a notable lack of diverse casting.

How does The Tiger Makes Out represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story aligns with the era's shift toward moral relativism and situational ethics. It explores urban loneliness and the breakdown of traditional social cohesion through a cynical perspective.

Does The Tiger Makes Out include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no presence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. Neurodivergence and chronic illness are not used as narrative drivers.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional romantic clichés by replacing idealized romance with cynical, psychologically complex dynamics.
  • Engages with the era's shifting social norms and the deconstruction of traditional interpersonal stability.
  • Avoids singular morality by focusing on the complexities of modern romantic entanglements and communication.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, focusing almost exclusively on a white, Anglo-Saxon cast.
  • Provides no representation for LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender gender expressions.
  • Contains no depictions of characters with disabilities or neurodivergent traits.

Official Synopsis

During a typically disaster-filled day, Ben Harris, an angry and frustrated bachelor mailman living in a cluttered Greenwich Village basement, learns he has been paying rent to a woman who hasn't owned his building in 6 years. No longer able to endure the injustices of society, he decides to activate the ferocious tiger within himself by abducting a helpless female and dragging her back to his lair.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.