You are here:

Five men and Rosa

Five men and Rosa

Representation Score

2.8/10

Limited

1964

Director

Sven Methling

Runtime

99 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film is a character-driven comedy that examines the intersections of social class and legality. It uses a 'criminal-meets-authority' dynamic to explore the gray areas of social conduct. While the film lacks significant markers of diverse representation or multi-layered identity, it excels in deconstructing the perceived infallibility of legal and social institutions. Ultimately, the narrative favors situational ethics and challenges the rigidity of institutional integrity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Five men and Rosa have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film centers on male camaraderie and a plot involving compromising photographs. It does not include any non-cisgender identities or critiques of the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Five men and Rosa portray gender?

Limited

The narrative focuses almost entirely on male characters. While the title mentions Rosa, the main plot drivers are the male characters.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Five men and Rosa?

Limited

Characters are described using specific 1960s professional archetypes. The story adheres to mid-century European social structures without challenging ethnic hierarchies.

How does Five men and Rosa represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores moral relativism by disrupting traditional hierarchies. A judge collaborates with a criminal to bypass institutional safeguards.

Does Five men and Rosa include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no mention of characters dealing with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent conditions. No assessment can be made regarding disability representation or its use as a plot device.

Present on Screen

  • The narrative explores moral relativism by questioning the traditional hierarchy of law and order.
  • The ensemble structure allows for a collision of different social and professional backgrounds.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks significant representation of non-cisgender identities or queer subtext.
  • ability to act is heavily concentrated among male characters, reinforcing traditional gender roles.
  • The cast adheres to homogeneous social structures without ethnic diversity.

Official Synopsis

In a hospital's five-bed room—room number 13—there are five very different men with very different backgrounds: District Court Judge Winther, fashion designer Philip André, bank teller Madsen, the incorrigible burglar Herluf "Smukke Arne" Jensen, and legation secretary Konrad Konradsen. The legation secretary has done something foolish and fallen into the clutches of the blackmailer Helmer Gamtofte. He is in possession of some compromising photographs, which he keeps in a safe deposit box at the bank where Madsen works. The camaraderie that develops in room 13 becomes the driving force that prompts the district court judge to suggest that "Smukke Arne" help Konradsen break into the bank and steal the photos.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.