
The Jönsson Gang in Mallorca
1989

1982
Director
Mikael Ekman
Runtime
106 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Sickan, Vanheden and Rocky try to rob the Berns nightclub one night, but Vanheden has made the mistake to invite his constantly drunk cousin, the old dynamiter Dynamite-Harry and he ruins the plan. Sickan is arrested, and has to spend 10 months in a small, locked room. When he is released, he has a new plan, but Rocky and Vanheden have decided to go straight. Together with Dynamite-Harry, Sickan plans to rob a cold store, managed by their arch-enemy, Wall-Enberg.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any mention of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focus remains strictly on a criminal ensemble without addressing themes of heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a male-dominated criminal hierarchy. There is no indication of female characters with agency or any subversion of traditional gender roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting and character names suggest a localized Swedish context. The narrative appears to follow a homogeneous demographic pattern without evidence of a multi-ethnic cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film explores social outsiders through themes of criminality and disrupted order. However, it relies on standard outlaw tropes rather than explicit systemic or cultural critique.
Disability Representation
No characters are identified as having physical impairments or neurodivergent traits. There is no visible representation of disability within the provided narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film operates as a traditional heist comedy, prioritizing genre tropes over social complexity. The narrative architecture is built around a male-centric criminal crew, which limits its demographic breadth. While the protagonists exist on the fringes of legal institutions, the film lacks intentionality regarding intersectional representation. It functions primarily as a localized genre piece rather than a vehicle for social commentary. Ultimately, the lack of diverse character identities and the focus on a homogeneous group results in a low diversity score.

1989

1984

1970

1977

2000

1981

1995

1979

2005

1984

1978

1982
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.