
The Treasure of San Gennaro
1966

1960
NRDirector
Basil Dearden
Runtime
116 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Involuntarily-retired Colonel Hyde recruits seven other dissatisfied ex-servicemen for a special project. Each of the men has a skeleton in the cupboard, is short of money, and is a service-trained expert in his field. The job is a bank robbery, and military discipline and planning are imposed by Hyde and second-in-command Race on the team, although civilian irritations do start getting in the way.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a strictly traditional framework. There is no discernible presence of queer subtext or non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative is driven exclusively by a male ensemble. Female characters are relegated to the periphery, reinforcing conventional patriarchal structures.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film critiques post-war racial tensions by centering the plot on friction with the West Indian community. It uses these conflicts to expose the mechanics of prejudice.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story challenges the sanctity of traditional British identity. It frames the protagonists' exclusionary views as a source of social decay and dysfunction.
Disability Representation
There is no significant depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the primary narrative arc.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film presents a striking contrast between its conservative casting and its progressive thematic inquiry. While the surface-level gender dynamics are rooted in the era's patriarchal norms, the narrative architecture is designed to deconstruct systemic prejudice. By framing the protagonists as anti-social vigilantes rather than moral heroes, the film critiques the very social structures it depicts. This approach allows the work to use a crime genre to examine the friction between traditional British society and emerging civil rights movements. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its ability to use the exclusionary ideologies of its characters to highlight the agency of marginalized groups and the instability caused by systemic oppression.

1966

1968

1969

1978

1975

1981

1958

1979

1965

2016

1982

1968
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.