You are here:

Cool Breeze

Name: Cool Breeze
Director: Barry Pollack
Released: 1972
Duration: 101 min

Representation Score

2.9/10

Limited

1972

Director

Barry Pollack

Runtime

101 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Cool Breeze follows a typical 1970s crime-genre trajectory, focusing on a released criminal planning a jewelry heist. The narrative structure relies on established genre clichés, emphasizing the heist plot over social complexity. The film lacks visible signs of progressive representation or diverse identities. The focus remains on the protagonist's criminal objectives and the financial mechanics of his plan. Without evidence of diverse casting or challenging traditional hierarchies, the film operates as a standard genre piece centered on masculine archetypes and economic structures.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Cool Breeze have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not explicitly include characters with non-binary or transgender identities. The plot revolves around a released criminal planning a jewelry heist.

How does Cool Breeze portray gender?

Limited

The story emphasizes a traditional crime-action structure centered around male-driven actions. It focuses on a released criminal and businessmen, reinforcing masculine stereotypes.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Cool Breeze?

Limited

There is no information about the racial or ethnic makeup of the cast. The narrative does not provide details on the social dynamics of the characters.

How does Cool Breeze represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores themes of criminality and the manipulation of financial institutions. It focuses on traditional economic structures without addressing anti-capitalist or secularist viewpoints.

Does Cool Breeze include disability representation?

Minimal

The synopsis does not mention characters dealing with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent conditions.

Present on Screen

The film presents a clear, focused crime-action narrative centered on a high-stakes jewelry theft.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender narratives.
The story relies on traditional masculine archetypes with little evidence of female empowerment.
There is no information about the racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
The narrative does not explore neurodivergent or physical disability experiences.

Official Synopsis

A paroled crook masterminds a $3 million jewelry theft to fund a bank for businessmen.

How are these scores produced? →