You are here:
12 Suicidal Teens

12 Suicidal Teens

2019

Director

Yukihiko Tsutsumi

Runtime

118 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Twelve boys and girls gather at an abandoned hospital to die for various different reasons. There, they find the body of a dead boy. The twelve boys and girl attempt to find the person who killed the boy. During their search, the reasons why they want to die are revealed.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.2/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film explores various individual traumas and non-normative lived experiences. While specific queer identities or romantic pairings are not explicitly confirmed, the narrative's focus on diverse motivations suggests a deep dive into marginalized perspectives.

Gender Representation

Good

The ensemble features a balanced mix of boys and girls. By prioritizing collective agency over a single male lead, the story disrupts traditional hierarchies and avoids standard masculine or feminine archetypes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast appears ethnically homogeneous within its localized setting. While the film uses social exclusion as a central theme, there is no explicit evidence of racial blending or diverse ethnic casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film critiques traditional social structures and institutional support systems. It centers on characters who have rejected societal participation, offering a nuanced look at systemic and familial pressures.

Disability Representation

Good

Mental health struggles and psychological distress serve as the primary drivers of the plot. The narrative grants significant agency to characters navigating these invisible disabilities rather than using them as mere plot devices.

Strengths

  • Strong focus on the agency of characters dealing with mental health struggles.
  • Effective disruption of traditional gender hierarchies through a collective ensemble.
  • Provocative critique of systemic social structures and institutional failures.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit evidence regarding racial and ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • Absence of confirmed LGBTQ+ identities or specific queer representation.
  • Potential for more explicit engagement with non-cisnormative lived experiences.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a character-driven mystery that centers on a collective of disenfranchised youth. By moving away from a singular protagonist, the narrative explores the psychological landscapes of social displacement and systemic alienation. The work challenges traditional institutional authority, such as the family unit and school systems, by focusing on characters who exist on the fringes of society. This approach allows for a complex exploration of subjective morality. While the film excels in portraying internal psychological struggles and challenging social norms, it lacks explicit evidence of racial diversity or confirmed LGBTQ+ identities, resulting in a moderate overall score.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.