You are here:

Amos & Andrew

Amos & Andrew

Representation Score

7.2/10

Good

1993

PG-13

Director

E. Max Frye

Runtime

96 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Amos & Andrew stands out for its intentional approach, placing Black masculinity and queer identity at the heart of its narrative. By centering a romantic relationship between two Black men in a rural New England setting, the film disrupts traditional genre expectations and challenges social hierarchies. The film uses its plot to critique systemic issues, such as racial profiling and the fallibility of small-town institutions. It treats underrepresented identities as primary rather than secondary. While the film excels in its nuanced exploration of identity and ability to act, it lacks representation regarding physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Amos & Andrew have LGBTQ+ representation?

Excellent

The film centers the romantic relationship between two Black male protagonists, integrating their intimacy into the core character arcs rather than treating it as a side story.

How does Amos & Andrew portray gender?

Good

The narrative challenges the stereotype of hyper-masculinity by highlighting male vulnerability and emotional complexity. The protagonists play a significant role in driving the story through their personal bond.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Amos & Andrew?

Excellent

A predominantly Black cast explores themes of racial perception and systemic error. The central conflict uses a case of mistaken identity to critique racial profiling.

How does Amos & Andrew represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story subtly critiques institutional power through the depiction of local law enforcement. It prioritizes the subjective truth of the protagonists over the flawed moral frameworks of the community.

Does Amos & Andrew include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no significant evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film.

Present on Screen

  • Integrates queer identity and romantic intimacy into the central character arcs.
  • Critiques racial profiling through a central conflict of mistaken identity.
  • Challenges hyper-male clichés by emphasizing male vulnerability and emotional complexity.
  • Provides strong narrative ability to act for underrepresented characters.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation or visibility regarding physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

When Andrew Sterling, a successful black urbanite writer, buys a vacation home on a resort in New England the police mistake him for a burglar. After surrounding his home with armed men, Chief Tolliver realizes his mistake and to avoid the bad publicity offers a thief in his jail, Amos Odell a deal.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.