You are here:
Taking Care of Business

Taking Care of Business

1990

R

Director

Arthur Hiller

Runtime

108 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

An uptight advertising exec has his entire life in a filofax organizer which mistakenly ends up in the hands of a friendly convict who poses as him.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.7/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film offers no discernible LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The social landscape remains strictly conventional, providing no engagement with queer identities.

Gender Representation

Limited

The story is heavily male-centric, focusing on the camaraderie of a male ensemble. Women occupy secondary, supporting roles while men drive the central conflict.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

New York City's demographic texture populates the ensemble, providing an urban feel. However, diversity is largely atmospheric rather than a central pillar of the plot.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative provides a strong critique of Western institutions by framing illegal street vending as a survival necessity. It portrays rebellion against economic systems as sympathetic.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities serving as central narrative elements.

Strengths

  • The film offers a sophisticated critique of capitalist bureaucracy and municipal law.
  • It provides a sympathetic portrayal of the working class navigating economic hardship.
  • The setting utilizes New York City's diverse demographic texture effectively.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative is heavily male-centric, leaving women in secondary roles.
  • There is a complete lack of LGBTQ+ representation or queer narratives.
  • Racial and ethnic diversity serves as atmosphere rather than a central theme.

AI Analysis

The film presents a striking contrast between its traditional demographic makeup and its progressive thematic subtext. While the casting and gender dynamics lean toward conventional 1990s tropes, the core narrative architecture is notably disruptive. The story prioritizes the struggle of the marginalized working class against rigid economic structures. By framing the subversion of authority as a legitimate form of empowerment, the film moves beyond a purely traditionalist comedy. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its systemic critique, even as it fails to provide significant representation for LGBTQ+ or female characters.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.