You are here:

Submit to Me Now

Name: Submit to Me Now
Director: Richard Kern
Released: 1987
Duration: 17 min

Representation Score

5.4/10

Fair

1987

Unrated

Director

Richard Kern

Runtime

17 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Submit to Me Now is a transgressive work that prioritizes shock and non-linear imagery over traditional narrative structures. Its contribution to diversity lies in its rejection of social norms and its use of non-conformist, visceral visuals. The film's impact is limited by a lack of demographic specifics. While it disrupts conventional morality through bodily transgressions, it lacks the character depth needed to explore identity through a nuanced lens. Ultimately, the film operates as an avant-garde disruption of mainstream expectations, using horror elements to challenge social stability rather than to represent specific underrepresented groups.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Submit to Me Now have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film uses fragmented, visceral imagery instead of well-developed character arcs. While the visuals suggest a move away from traditional assumptions about relationships, specific identities are not clearly defined.

How does Submit to Me Now portray gender?

Fair

The extreme depiction of self-harm and unconventional grooming disrupts typical gender behavior. However, the focus is on shocking the viewer rather than challenging traditional gender roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Submit to Me Now?

Minimal

There is insufficient information regarding the racial or ethnic composition of the cast to provide a meaningful analysis.

How does Submit to Me Now represent religion and culture?

Good

The work critiques social order by focusing on anti-social imagery rather than cohesive storytelling. It rejects traditional Western stability through postmodern deconstruction.

Does Submit to Me Now include disability representation?

Limited

Intense depictions of physical trauma and body changes challenge standard ideas of normalcy. These elements seem to serve horror aesthetics rather than showing people with disabilities taking control of their lives.

Present on Screen

Challenges traditional social norms through transgressive, non-conformist imagery.
Disrupts conventional cinematic morality and Western social stability.
Uses a postmodern approach to deconstruct traditional cultural institutions.

Limited or Absent

Needs more detail to confirm specific LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
Focuses on shock value rather than nuanced subversion of gender roles.
Depictions of physical trauma serve horror aesthetics rather than disability ability to act.

Official Synopsis

Oddballs dancing, leering at camera, guy shaving a nontraditional part of his body and man ripping his own throat out, woman stabbing herself to death.

How are these scores produced? →