You are here:

A Feather in His Hare

Name: A Feather in His Hare
Director: Chuck Jones
Released: 1948
Duration: 7 min

Representation Score

0.9/10

Minimal

1948

Director

Chuck Jones

Runtime

7 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

A Feather in His Hare is a product of the mid-century studio system that emphasizes slapstick humor over social commentary. The film's structure depends on established social hierarchies, particularly through the use of ethnic caricatures to drive the plot. The animation fails to give real power to underrepresented groups, instead using them as comedic devices. This reliance on harmful stereotypes is significant enough that the film has been banned for its offensive content. Ultimately, the work reinforces traditional racial and cultural hierarchies. It lacks depth in reflecting multiple aspects of identity and fails to challenge the prevailing prejudices of its era.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A Feather in His Hare have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any visible LGBTQ identities or non-binary gender expressions. It follows the traditional social structures of the time without questioning the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does A Feather in His Hare portray gender?

Limited

The story revolves around a masculine-driven slapstick framework. There is no indication of women taking a leading role or challenging gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A Feather in His Hare?

Minimal

The film uses a harmful, oversimplified caricature of Native American identity. It employs a 'hungry Indian' stereotype that perpetuates historical prejudices and racial stereotypes.

How does A Feather in His Hare represent religion and culture?

Minimal

The work presents a colonialist perspective where the 'other' is portrayed as a primitive figure. It reinforces a hierarchy of cultural superiority without addressing these issues.

Does A Feather in His Hare include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no characters shown with visible or invisible disabilities in this narrative.

Present on Screen

Chuck Jones' direction highlights sophisticated character psychology and high-concept humor.

Limited or Absent

The film relies on harmful racial caricatures and offensive stereotypes.
There is a complete lack of women's ability to drive the story or gender diversity.
The narrative reinforces colonialist clichés and cultural hierarchies.

Official Synopsis

A hungry indian tries to cook bugs, yet Bugs outwits him yet again. Banned for offensive depiction of Native Americans.

How are these scores produced? →