New Showbiz

You are here:
And the King Said, What a Fantastic Machine

And the King Said, What a Fantastic Machine

2023

Director

Axel Danielson, Maximilien Van Aertryck

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

From the first camera to 45 billion cameras worldwide today, the visual sociologist filmmakers widen their lens to expose both humanity's unique obsession with the camera's image and the social consequences that lay ahead.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.5/10

Good

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The documentary focuses on the sociological history of camera technology rather than specific identity arcs. There is no evidence of non-heteronormative character studies or critiques of heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film examines humanity's obsession with imagery, potentially challenging the traditional male gaze. However, specific instances of subverting gender hierarchies are not explicitly detailed.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The global scope of the film's technological history necessitates a non-Anglo-centric view. It likely provides diverse cultural perspectives on how imagery is produced and consumed worldwide.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The work analyzes the social consequences of a hyper-visual world. It critiques how technology mediates truth and power, moving toward a more global, less Western-centric visual standard.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The narrative prioritizes technological and sociological themes over character-driven stories. There is no explicit evidence regarding the portrayal of physical disabilities or neurodivergence.

Strengths

  • The global scope ensures a broad, non-Anglo-centric perspective on technological history.
  • The sociological approach critiques systemic power dynamics and the influence of visual media.
  • The narrative avoids traditional tropes to focus on macro-level human connectivity.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks specific, character-driven representation for LGBTQ+ identities.
  • There is no explicit focus on neurodivergence or physical disability narratives.
  • The systemic focus may overlook individual experiences of gendered perception.

AI Analysis

This documentary functions as a piece of visual sociology, prioritizing systemic examination over individualistic hero tropes. It deconstructs how the proliferation of cameras shapes human perception and global connectivity. The film's strength lies in its macro-sociological lens, which naturally incorporates a wide array of cultural and racial perspectives due to its global subject matter. It moves away from localized narratives to explore how technology influences humanity as a whole. However, the film lacks specific, identity-based representation. Because it focuses on the evolution of the medium rather than personal stories, specific depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or disability narratives are absent.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.