New Showbiz

You are here:
Mr. Wrong

Mr. Wrong

1986

Director

Gaylene Preston

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A small town woman, fresh to the city, buys a used Jaguar haunted by the ghost of a woman who was slain in it.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.3/10

Limited

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any discernible presence of LGBTQ+ characters. Romantic tension is strictly framed within a heteronormative paradigm.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative centers on the female experience through protagonist Jane. However, the film adheres to genre tropes that often position female leads in states of vulnerability.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

Casting is predominantly homogeneous, reflecting standard mid-80s demographic compositions. The setting aligns with a traditional, largely white socioeconomic milieu.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story operates within a conventional Western framework. It utilizes standard social structures as a backdrop rather than critiquing them.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. Disability is not utilized as a central theme or character trait.

Strengths

  • The film centers the narrative on the female experience through its protagonist.
  • Jane serves as the primary driver of the plot and the central perspective.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives.
  • Casting is predominantly homogeneous and lacks racial diversity.
  • There is no integration of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
  • The narrative adheres to traditional gender hierarchies rather than subverting them.

AI Analysis

Mr. Wrong is a genre-driven psychological thriller that functions primarily within the established social and demographic norms of the 1980s. While it provides a female-centric perspective by making Jane the primary driver of the plot, it does not actively subvert traditional gender hierarchies or power dynamics. The film lacks intersectional complexity, offering almost no representation for LGBTQ+ individuals or characters with disabilities. The racial composition is homogeneous, mirroring the standard casting of mid-80s American cinema without attempting to challenge historical norms. Ultimately, the work prioritizes suspense and traditional archetypes over the disruption of systemic hierarchies. It remains a conventional thriller that operates within a binary moral framework and a standard Western cultural backdrop.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.