
What a Crush
2018
No Poster Available
2013
Director
Paolo Cedolin Petrini
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Matthew has everything a young man could want: a large apartment in Monaco, which he shares with his best friend Sebastian, affluence and all the women he wants end up in his bed. When Emma young seasonal worker with a strong character, has no other choice but to live with him, disputes are in the air and their incompatibility is undoubtedly. Between battle of the sexes and life lessons, Emma and Matthew will share their conceptions of desire and the male / female relationship ... and gradually, disagreements will take less and less importance ...
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses entirely on the heterosexual tension between Matthew and Emma. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
Emma is presented as a strong-willed challenger to Matthew's affluent lifestyle. While this disrupts traditional femininity, the plot's movement toward romantic equilibrium suggests a return to conventional dynamics.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story centers on class distinctions rather than explicit racial or ethnic exploration. While set in cosmopolitan Monaco, the cast lacks documented diverse representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative explores socioeconomic disparity and the friction between affluence and seasonal labor. It prioritizes interpersonal desire over specific religious or moral doctrines.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The story does not feature neurodivergent or chronically ill individuals.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Incompatibles is a character-driven comedy that relies heavily on traditional romantic tropes. It finds its footing by pitting a strong-willed seasonal worker against an affluent protagonist, creating a friction based on class and gendered expectations. However, the film lacks intersectional depth. The narrative focuses on micro-level interpersonal dynamics rather than addressing broader systemic issues or providing representation for LGBTQ+ or disabled communities. Ultimately, the film functions as a standard exploration of romantic reconciliation, prioritizing the resolution of personal disagreements over a meaningful deconstruction of social hierarchies.

2018

2013

2011

2013

2000

2012

1996

2007

2008

2013

2016

1984
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.