
Under Control
2011

2016
PGDirector
Robert Kenner
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
September 18, 1980, 6:25 p.m., Titan II base in Damascus, Arkansas. On this fateful night an explosion kills an Air Force member and transforms the lives of everyone on the base. Honing in on a single case of so-called "human error", Command and Control juxtaposes precision on a minute scale against the gargantuan risks inherent in the United States' aggressive nuclear proliferation policy during the Cold War.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary contains no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. This absence aligns with the film's narrow focus on Cold War-era military policy and nuclear command structures.
Gender Representation
The film maintains a balanced distribution of expertise by featuring both male and female interviewees. It avoids centering a singular masculine archetype, distributing agency across various professional experts.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Representation reflects the demographic realities of high-level military and policy sectors during the Cold War. The narrative focus remains largely centered on the Western military-industrial complex.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a deep critique of Western institutions and the logic of nuclear deterrence. It prioritizes systemic skepticism over traditional patriotic or nationalist narratives.
Disability Representation
There are no depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The narrative remains strictly focused on the technical and political mechanics of nuclear command.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Command and Control is a systemic critique of nuclear proliferation rather than a study of demographic identity. Its low scores in LGBTQ+ and disability categories are a byproduct of its specific historical and technical subject matter. The film finds its strength in cultural representation by deconstructing the perceived stability of Western military institutions. It challenges the narrative of institutional infallibility, framing nuclear hegemony as a systemic risk. While the film provides a balanced gender perspective among its experts, it lacks racial plurality, mirroring the historical lack of diversity within the command roles of the military-industrial complex.

2011

2016

2013

2006

2013

2012

2015

2021

2019

2025

2015

2017
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.