You are here:

The Pelican Brief

The Pelican Brief

Representation Score

4.5/10

Fair

1993

PG-13

Director

Alan J. Pakula

Runtime

141 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Pelican Brief shifts the focus of a political thriller to a female protagonist's intellectual prowess, disrupting typical male-dominated narratives. This change is further emphasized by a diverse cast that avoids traditional stereotypes. While the film does not represent LGBTQ+ identities or characters with disabilities, it stands out by portraying a Black man in a powerful role within the FBI. The film's strength lies in its critical examination of institutional reliability, using its characters to explore the fragility of truth and the corruption of state authority.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Pelican Brief have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or explore non-straight relationships. The story focuses solely on the central partnership and the larger conspiracy.

How does The Pelican Brief portray gender?

Good

Darby Shaw is the main intellectual force, challenging traditional thriller clichés with her investigative skills. Her male partner supports her work, facilitating her investigations.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Pelican Brief?

Good

A diverse pair of leads marks a significant change from earlier standards. Denzel Washington's role as a top-ranking federal agent highlights his substantial influence and expertise.

How does The Pelican Brief represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story critiques Western institutions by questioning the stability of American legal and political systems. It portrays the presidency as a site of corruption.

Does The Pelican Brief include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no significant depictions of physical or neurodevelopmental disabilities among the main characters.

Present on Screen

  • The female protagonist drives the investigation intellectually.
  • The diverse cast showcases significant professional authority and competence.
  • The narrative offers a sophisticated critique of Western institutions.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
  • There are no depictions of physical or neurodevelopmental disabilities.

Official Synopsis

A law student's theory about the recent deaths of two Supreme Court justices embroils her in a far-reaching web of murder, corruption, and greed.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.