You are here:

Reefer Madness II: The True Story

Reefer Madness II: The True Story

Representation Score

2.0/10

Minimal

1985

R

Director

Kent Skov

Runtime

78 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This meta-comedic sequel centers on the vindication of a single male character, Detective Jack Perry. While it cleverly deconstructs how media can smear an individual's reputation, the film remains narrow in its scope. It functions more as a personal grievance narrative than a tool for social exploration. The production relies on conventional archetypes, specifically the aggressive, firearm-wielding male hero. This approach prioritizes individualistic justice over any broader engagement with diverse social identities or perspectives that reflect multiple aspects of identity. Ultimately, the film's attempt to challenge 'truth' is limited to the realm of cinematic reputation. It does not extend its critique to include a meaningful variety of human experiences or cultural backgrounds.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Reefer Madness II: The True Story have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not feature any LGBTQ+ characters or stories centered around non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities. The narrative focuses solely on a male protagonist's struggle against media attacks.

How does Reefer Madness II: The True Story portray gender?

Limited

The story revolves around a traditional masculine archetype, reinforcing clichés of the lone, aggressive male hero through the protagonist's use of physical force.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Reefer Madness II: The True Story?

Minimal

The film maintains a homogeneous narrative structure with no indication of diverse casting or a non-white majority cast to challenge historical norms.

How does Reefer Madness II: The True Story represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film critiques media objectivity by presenting previous depictions as lies. However, it relies on traditional vigilante-style justice rather than subversive cultural deconstruction.

Does Reefer Madness II: The True Story include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities being included or depicted.

Present on Screen

  • Critiques the fallibility of media representation and the potential for slanderous portrayals.
  • Offers a meta-cinematic commentary on how films can shape public perception of individuals.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of diverse racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Relies on traditional, aggressive male clichés rather than subverting gender hierarchies.
  • Fails to include characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

"It's all a LIE!!" or so screams our hero, DETECTIVE JACK PERRY. We meet Jack in the prologue as he interrupts a telecast of a movie review program. He claims REEFER MADNESS, the classic cult film which the two critics are reviewing, is nothing but a slanderous lie. We have been shown clips of the original film where Perry was portrayed as a low-life drug pusher. Now, here it is, decades after REEFER MADNESS was first released, and the real life Jack Perry shows up and claims, "...the movie was made to frame me. I was actually an undercover cop!" The two critics don't buy any of his story. Jack says he can prove what he claims by showing his version of the movie -- which he just happens to have brought along. The reviewers tell Jack that they don't have time to show his film on their program. Jack's 44 Magnum convinces them otherwise.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.