You are here:
The Master and Margarita

The Master and Margarita

1972

Director

Aleksandar Petrović

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Maestro Nikolai Masoudov, a talented writer, and his assistant Margaret, are working on a biblical story of Pontius Pilate. The Satan — Woland, and his lieutenants, are harassing Master by surveillance, by killing his friend, and sending another friend to Gulag prison in Siberia. Victimized by their harassment, Master becomes paranoid, and is locked up in a mental institution. Margaret is trying to save him regardless of the danger.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The story centers on the intense romantic bond between the Master and Margarita. No explicit non-cisnormative identities or queer-coded subplots are present in the narrative.

Gender Representation

Good

Margarita serves as a powerful catalyst rather than a passive interest. She demonstrates absolute agency by navigating supernatural realms to secure the Master's liberation.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film focuses on 1930s Moscow and ancient Jerusalem. Representation is dictated by these historical settings rather than intentional racial intersectionality.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film critiques centralized authority and state-mandated ideology. It uses supernatural elements to expose the hypocrisy and corruption of rigid social and religious orders.

Disability Representation

Fair

The Master's descent into paranoia and institutionalization highlights mental health struggles. This portrayal uses his vulnerability to critique the cruelty of state surveillance.

Strengths

  • Margarita is portrayed as a transformative, powerful force with absolute agency.
  • The film offers a profound critique of centralized authority and institutional corruption.
  • The narrative successfully subverts the 'damsel in distress' trope through its female lead.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks explicit representation of non-cisnormative gender identities.
  • Racial and ethnic diversity is limited by the specific historical settings.
  • The narrative does not prioritize contemporary demographic variety.

AI Analysis

Aleksandar Petrović’s film is a sophisticated deconstruction of power, prioritizing intellectual subversion over demographic variety. It excels in its portrayal of female agency and its critique of institutionalized dogma. While the film lacks contemporary LGBTQ+ or racial intersectionality, it finds depth in its exploration of individual morality against oppressive systems. The narrative uses the supernatural to challenge the dehumanizing nature of the state. Ultimately, the work's strength lies in its structural rebellion and its elevation of the individual artist against a corrupt collective.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.