You are here:
Like Dogs

Like Dogs

2021

NR

Director

Randy Van Dyke

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A behavioral experiment treating humans like animals goes awry when a University Student manipulates the research with deadly results.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.3/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. The story focuses entirely on the psychological mechanics of the experiment.

Gender Representation

Fair

The protagonist possesses high agency, transitioning from an experimental subject to a primary driver of the plot. However, the character's gender is not explicitly defined.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

There is no indication of a diverse cast or ethnic metaphors. The setting appears to be a localized academic environment without multi-ethnic integration.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative critiques institutional corruption and systemic cruelty. It explores themes of subverting authority through the lens of a student manipulating a university experiment.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film provides no evidence of characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities within its narrative framework.

Strengths

  • The protagonist demonstrates high agency by actively manipulating the experimental parameters.
  • The story provides a critique of institutional corruption and systemic authority.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation for LGBTQ+, racial, and disabled communities.
  • The narrative focus is narrow, centering on individual survival rather than intersectional themes.

AI Analysis

Like Dogs is a contained psychological thriller that prioritizes the mechanics of a behavioral experiment over demographic breadth. The film's narrative strength lies in its critique of institutional power, as the protagonist subverts systemic structures to reclaim agency. However, the film fails to incorporate meaningful representation for LGBTQ+, racial, or disabled communities. The focus remains narrow, centering on individual psychological dominance and survival within a localized academic setting. Ultimately, the film offers a moderate exploration of situational ethics and authority, but it lacks the intersectional depth required for a higher diversity score.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.