You are here:

Mongrel

Mongrel

Representation Score

4.0/10

Limited

1982

Director

Robert A. Burns

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Mongrel is a product of the early 1980s horror era, prioritizing visceral tension and supernatural retribution over social complexity. The narrative relies on genre-standard formulas rather than intentional storytelling that reflects multiple aspects of identity or the disruption of social hierarchies. The film lacks meaningful representation across most categories, focusing instead on a localized plot involving a vengeful animal and psychological breakdown. It functions as a standard genre piece without progressive social commentary.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Mongrel have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not prominently feature LGBTQ characters or identities. It adheres to a typical horror framework without addressing the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Mongrel portray gender?

Limited

The story centers on a high-strung book editor and boarding house dynamics. It does not challenge traditional gender roles or stereotypes.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Mongrel?

Limited

The setting follows a conventional horror structure with a homogeneous cast. There is no indication of multi-ethnic or diverse racial representation.

How does Mongrel represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story explores themes of guilt and retribution through visceral horror. It does not engage with significant anti-capitalist or secularist critiques.

Does Mongrel include disability representation?

Limited

The protagonist's high-strung nature may indicate mental health issues. However, it is unclear if this is portrayed with real ability to act or used as a plot device.

Present on Screen

  • The film delves into psychological themes of guilt and retribution.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative lacks multi-layered complexity and diverse character identities.
  • There is no evidence of challenging traditional gender or social roles.
  • The story follows a homogeneous structure lacking racial or cultural depth.

Official Synopsis

At a boarding house, a vicious dog gets loose from his chain and chews up a tenant's ass that was teasing him with a piece of raw meat. As a result, the dog is shot to death. Another tenant, a very high strung book editor, is picked on a lot. Soon he starts having dreams that the dog has returned and dead chewed up tenants begin popping up everywhere.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.