
Skin of Roses
1978

1985
Director
Sinan Çetin
Runtime
83 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Yaprak is just one of thousands of young women, who leave their quiet village lives behind them to seek their fortune in Istanbul. But the reality of life in a big city is harsh, and Yaprak is forced to take a job in one of the cities licensed brothels. Her beauty and youth make her popular with the patrons and she is soon the focus of the attention of two men; Necmi, a spineless but well meaning young man, and Arab, a deranged pimp who has recently lost his main source of income, his wife Zargana. Necmi wants to take Yaprak away from her nightmare existence, but soon finds himself forced to separate from her by the viscous Arab. Arab spends all of Yaprak's money, but after a savage attack on her, she comes to her senses. She and Necmi get married and as Yaprak says farewell to her friends in the brothel, Arab returns for the last time to seek his brutal revenge...
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on heteronormative romantic dynamics and survival within a patriarchal urban structure. No queer narratives or non-cisnormative identities are present in the story.
Gender Representation
Yaprak's journey from systemic exploitation to reclaiming her agency provides a strong female-centric arc. The film also subverts masculine tropes by portraying male characters as fragile or ineffective.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story examines the tensions of rural-to-urban migration in Turkey. While the cast is ethnically homogeneous, the character Arab utilizes a localized ethnic archetype.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative offers a gritty critique of urban capitalism and traditional social structures. It portrays the city as a harsh environment that forces moral compromises.
Disability Representation
There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed as central to the character arcs or plot progression.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Number 14 is a social-realist drama that examines the friction between rural traditions and the harsh realities of urban modernization. It succeeds in centering a female protagonist's struggle for agency against systemic exploitation. However, the film lacks intersectional depth, offering no LGBTQ+ representation and relying on ethnic archetypes. While it critiques social structures, the cast remains ethnically homogeneous. Ultimately, the film earns its score by subverting traditional masculine competence and providing a critical lens on the economic pressures facing marginalized women.

1978

1956

1964

1971

1962

1984

1974

1980

1954

1948

1968

1997
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.