Careful What You Wish For
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Zipper
2015
RDirector
Mora Stephens
Runtime
103 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Sam Ellis is a man on the rise — a hot-shot federal prosecutor on the cusp of a bright political future. But what was meant to be a one-time experience with an escort turns into a growing addiction — a new demon threatening to destroy his life, family, and career.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.6/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a heterosexual male protagonist and his relationship with an escort. There is no visible evidence of queer narratives or non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a male federal prosecutor in a position of institutional power. The female character acts primarily as a catalyst for the protagonist's personal descent.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
There is no information regarding the racial composition of the cast or setting. The narrative lacks evidence of a diverse or intersectional cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot follows a traditional cautionary tale about personal morality and addiction. It focuses on individual vice rather than systemic or cultural critique.
Disability Representation
The film does not mention physical disabilities or neurodivergence. Addiction is presented as a metaphorical demon rather than a documented mental health condition.
Strengths
- Explores the psychological landscape of individual addiction and personal descent.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks visible LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.
- Centers on a traditional male protagonist with limited female agency.
- Provides no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
- Fails to offer a systemic or cultural critique of the protagonist's environment.
AI Analysis
Zipper functions as a character study of individual moral failure within a traditional professional framework. The narrative follows a high-status man facing personal ruin, which tends to reinforce existing social hierarchies rather than challenge them. The film lacks intersectional complexity and does not intentionally disrupt traditional social norms. It relies on conventional plot mechanics centered on a singular male perspective. Without evidence of diverse casting or systemic critique, the film remains a narrow exploration of personal instability and professional collapse.
Similar Movies
Paranoia
2013
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
The Words
2012
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Edmond
2005
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
People I Know
2002
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Derailed
2005
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Fatal Attraction
1987
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Locke
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
One Hour Photo
2002
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Obsessed
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.5 out of 10
The Canyons
2013
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Fatale
2020
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.