New Showbiz

You are here:
Woman Between Wolf and Dog

Woman Between Wolf and Dog

1979

Director

André Delvaux

Runtime

111 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Lieve is a Belgian woman who marries just as World War II is beginning. When the Germans invade, her husband goes off to fight them, but he swiftly returns home after the invasion succeeds. Later, he decides that the Germans are on the right side of things, and goes off to fight for them on the Eastern Front. Soon afterward, a resistance fighter is stranded on her doorway, and she hides him. The two of them fall in love, and the conflicts and joys of this relationship cause Lieve continued grief well after the end of the war.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The narrative centers on a heteronormative romantic conflict between a wife, her husband, and a resistance fighter. No queer subtext or non-cisnormative identities are present in the primary character arcs.

Gender Representation

Good

Lieve serves as the central agent of decision-making rather than a passive observer. She subverts domestic expectations by harboring a resistance fighter, navigating the moral weight of the war.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film reflects the demographic homogeneity of occupied Belgium during the mid-20th century. The story focuses on intra-European political conflicts rather than intersectional racial dynamics.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film deconstructs nationalistic ideals by presenting a husband who aligns with the occupying forces. It favors a complex, relativistic view of human behavior over simplistic moral dichotomies.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence that disability, neurodivergence, or chronic illness play a central role in the character arcs or the narrative structure.

Strengths

  • The film provides strong gendered agency by making Lieve the primary driver of the plot.
  • It offers a sophisticated, non-linear exploration of subjective morality and human behavior.
  • The narrative avoids simplistic 'good vs. evil' tropes in favor of complex psychological depth.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer subtext.
  • The casting and setting reflect a lack of racial and ethnic diversity.
  • There is no significant focus on disability or neurodivergent experiences.

AI Analysis

André Delvaux’s drama succeeds as a psychological study of moral ambiguity. By centering the narrative on Lieve’s choices, the film elevates female agency within a period of systemic upheaval. However, the work remains limited by its historical setting and era-specific romantic structures. It lacks intersectional depth regarding race and LGBTQ+ identities, focusing instead on a homogeneous European landscape. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its refusal to use traditional heroic tropes. It prioritizes the messy, subjective experiences of individuals caught between conflicting political loyalties.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Reunion in France

Reunion in France

1942

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.