You are here:

No Greater Law

Name: No Greater Law
Director: Tom Dumican
Released: 2018
Duration: 89 min

Representation Score

6.7/10

Good

2018

TV-14

Director

Tom Dumican

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

No Greater Law is a sociological exploration of the clash between religious autonomy and state-mandated child welfare. It emphasizes the tension between individual beliefs and legal authority rather than demographic diversity. The film stands out in its cultural critique by dismantling the authority of Western secular institutions. It portrays the conflict between religious doctrine and medical science as a nuanced moral dilemma rather than a simple binary. However, the film lacks diversity in traditional identity categories. The narrative is firmly rooted in a patriarchal structure, and there is no visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or specific racial demographics.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does No Greater Law have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on a faith-healing family and their religious practices. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives exploring non-straight relationships.

How does No Greater Law portray gender?

Fair

The story revolves around a traditional patriarchal structure centered on a male leader. While it examines the consequences of this power dynamic, the main character retains significant control over events.

How racially and ethnically diverse is No Greater Law?

Fair

Set in the American West, the film does not specify the racial makeup of the family or investigators. The score reflects a neutral tone regarding racial diversity.

How does No Greater Law represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The documentary delves deeply into institutional critique. It examines the tension between religious doctrine and secular laws, challenging the assumed benevolence of state and medical systems.

Does No Greater Law include disability representation?

Fair

The film addresses medical conditions and child mortality as points of legal and religious debate. However, it does not center on the experiences or ability to act of individuals with physical or neurodivergent conditions.

Present on Screen

Provides a sophisticated critique of the interplay between religious freedom and state intervention.
Offers a nuanced exploration of the tension between subjective morality and standardized institutional mandates.

Limited or Absent

Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight narratives.
Centers ability to act on a patriarchal male figurehead, reinforcing traditional gender hierarchies.
Focuses on medical conditions as legal disputes rather than giving ability to act to individuals with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

In the rugged American west, a patriarch of a faith healing family fights to protect the right to deny his children medical care while an investigation into child deaths closes in on him and his church.

How are these scores produced? →