You are here:
Riddled with Deceit: A Martha's Vineyard Mystery

Riddled with Deceit: A Martha's Vineyard Mystery

2020

TV-PG

Director

Andy Mikita

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Former detective Jeff Jackson teams up with Dr. Zee Madieras to track down their friend's missing emerald brooch, a thief, and also... a murderer.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit non-cisnormative identities or same-sex romantic arcs. It follows a standard investigative framework common in procedural mysteries.

Gender Representation

Fair

A professional partnership exists between a male detective and a female doctor. While the female lead holds a high-agency role, the dynamics appear to follow traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast leans toward standard procedural patterns. While the name Zee Madieras suggests potential ethnic diversity, there is no clear evidence of a non-Anglo-Saxon majority.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story adheres to cozy mystery conventions, focusing on community stability. It avoids critiques of Western institutions or the promotion of moral relativism.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no mention of characters navigating physical, neurodivergent, or mental health conditions within the narrative.

Strengths

  • The female lead, Dr. Zee Madieras, occupies a high-agency, intellectual professional role.
  • The narrative establishes a functional, professional partnership between its two main leads.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative romantic arcs.
  • The story follows traditional heteronormative and Anglo-centric casting patterns common to the genre.
  • There is a lack of representation regarding physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Riddled with Deceit: A Martha's Vineyard Mystery operates as a conventional mystery drama. It relies on established genre tropes rather than attempting to subvert social hierarchies or systemic norms. The film provides meaningful professional roles for its leads, such as the doctor and the detective. However, these roles do not necessarily disrupt traditional masculine or feminine dynamics. Ultimately, the work prioritizes plot mechanics and suspense. It lacks the intersectional depth or intentional systemic subversion required to move beyond a baseline procedural rating.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.