The film lacks evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity. It appears to rely on traditional genre casting without exploring queer perspectives.

The fraternity setting centers on masculine social structures. There is no documented evidence of subverting gender hierarchies or portraying masculinity in a non-traditional way.

The focus on collegiate fraternity subcultures often leans toward homogeneous casting. No high-agency characters of color or race-bent casting are present in the narrative.

The story operates within standard Western genre conventions. It lacks narratives that challenge traditional Western institutions or offer systemic institutional critiques.

While horrifying visions could metaphorically relate to mental health, there is no evidence they are portrayed with agency rather than as mere plot devices.