New Showbiz

You are here:
2000 Mules

2000 Mules

2022

NR

Director

Dinesh D'Souza, Bruce Schooley, Debbie D'Souza

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Bestselling Author and award-winning Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza expose widespread, coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election, sufficient to change the overall outcome. Drawing on research provided by the election integrity group True the Vote, “2000 Mules” offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video. The geotracking evidence, based on a database of 10 trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of paid professional operatives called mules delivering fraudulent and illegal votes to mail-in dropboxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence, obtained from official surveillance cameras installed by the states themselves, confirms the geotracking evidence. The movie concludes by exploring numerous ways to prevent the fraud from happening again.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.4/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any meaningful engagement with LGBTQ+ identities or narratives. There are no depictions of non-cisnormative gender identities or same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative does not actively subvert traditional gender hierarchies. It lacks female characters in positions of intellectual or systemic authority that would disrupt conventional patriarchal structures.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Visual evidence utilizes footage from diverse urban environments, but the narrative does not center these populations with agency. Individuals in surveillance footage are framed through suspicion rather than complexity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Minimal

The film aligns with traditionalist values and rejects postmodern deconstruction. It emphasizes a singular view of civic integrity without engaging with identity politics or systemic victimhood.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities. The documentary does not use characters with disabilities to explore agency or social barriers.

Strengths

  • The film maintains a singular focus on its technical and investigative framework regarding electoral mechanics.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks engagement with LGBTQ+ identities, non-cisnormative gender identities, or same-sex intimacy.
  • The narrative fails to center diverse populations with agency, instead using urban settings as backdrops for suspicion.
  • There is a complete absence of representation for physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • The film does not utilize gender as a tool for social critique or the deconstruction of patriarchal structures.

AI Analysis

2000 Mules functions as a traditionalist critique of institutional integrity rather than a vehicle for social representation. The film's primary objective is the investigation of electoral processes, which results in a narrative that bypasses contemporary discourses regarding identity and intersectionality. Because the film seeks to reinforce traditional procedural norms and challenges the legitimacy of current institutional authority from a conservative standpoint, it lacks progressive markers. It does not utilize the subversion of gender roles or the centering of marginalized identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.