You are here:
Nickel & Dime

Nickel & Dime

1992

PG

Director

Ben Moses

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A P.I. hasn't paid taxes in ages. When the IRS sends an accountant to investigate him, his only way out is to solve his latest case of a missing heiress. However, someone wants to prevent this.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It appears to follow standard detective tropes that rely on heteronormative social structures.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on a male private investigator. While a missing heiress is central to the plot, she seems to function as a device rather than an active agent.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

There is no information regarding the racial composition of the cast. The film likely follows the homogeneous casting structures typical of early 90s comedies.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The plot explores individual versus systemic authority through an IRS conflict. However, it frames tax evasion as comedy rather than a critique of Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • The film utilizes a classic detective trope that provides a clear, recognizable comedic conflict.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks meaningful representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative perspectives.
  • Female characters appear to serve as plot devices rather than independent agents.
  • The film fails to provide evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within its cast.
  • There is a lack of representation for characters with disabilities.

AI Analysis

Nickel & Dime follows a conventional comedic structure that prioritizes standard genre tropes over social subversion. The narrative focuses on a male protagonist navigating a detective mystery, which limits the scope for diverse perspectives. The film lacks intentionality in disrupting social hierarchies. It relies on established archetypes, such as the rogue investigator, without exploring intersectional identities or systemic critiques. Ultimately, the production reflects the traditional, homogeneous casting and storytelling patterns common in early 1990s genre cinema.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.