You are here:

The Black Pimpernel

Name: The Black Pimpernel
Director: Åsa Faringer, Ulf Hultberg
Released: 2007
Duration: 95 min

Representation Score

6.2/10

Good

2007

Director

Åsa Faringer, Ulf Hultberg

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film serves as a narrative of resistance, centering on the individual's moral decisions against state-sanctioned violence. It effectively deconstructs institutional authority by framing heroism as the subversion of law to preserve human life. By focusing on the 1973 Chilean coup, the story shifts from geopolitical power structures to a humanistic defense of the vulnerable. This approach aligns the film with progressive values of systemic critique. While the narrative excels in cultural and racial context, it remains silent on specific identity-based representations like LGBTQ+ or disability, focusing instead on the immediate struggle for survival.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Black Pimpernel have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not explicitly depict LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships. The score reflects a neutral stance within a historical context focused on physical survival.

How does The Black Pimpernel portray gender?

Fair

While centered on a male diplomat, the protagonist challenges traditional bureaucratic roles. He prioritizes empathy and humanitarian intervention over rigid, detached masculine leadership models.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Black Pimpernel?

Good

The Chilean setting necessitates a diverse, non-Anglo-Saxon cast. The narrative focuses on protecting the various ethnic and social groups of the local population against military oppression.

How does The Black Pimpernel represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film provides a strong critique of Western-aligned military institutions. It prioritizes human rights and moral necessity over nationalistic loyalty or established political structures.

Does The Black Pimpernel include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no specific evidence regarding the portrayal of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains on political trauma and survival.

Present on Screen

Strong systemic critique of oppressive military and political institutions.
Effective portrayal of diverse Chilean social and ethnic groups.
Subverts traditional masculine archetypes through empathetic leadership.

Limited or Absent

Lack of explicit representation for LGBTQ+ identities.
No visible focus on characters with disabilities.
Narrative focus remains narrow on political survival over identity.

Official Synopsis

The story about Swedish ambassador in Chile - Harald Edelstam - and his heroic actions to protect the innocent people from the execution during and after the military coup on September 11th 1973.

How are these scores produced? →