
P.S. Your Cat Is Dead!
2002
No Poster Available
1999
Director
Paul Todisco
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Dave Keenan left Syracuse for a new life in Arizona. When that didn't work out, he moved back to upstate New York. He works a dead-end job at a department store in a mall, his car has broken down (and the mechanic is taking forever to fix it) and his ex-girlfriend wants him to join her in New York City. To make matters more complicated, one of his co-workers, a high school girl named Nichole seems to be getting romantically interested in him. Fortunately, his best friend Freakis around for him to hang out with and offer such choice philosophical observations, like "I can't think of a single movie that couldn't be improved by a lesbian sex scene." Dave is stuck in a rut and has to decide what to do with his life.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film engages with queer visibility through dialogue that challenges heteronormative standards. A character specifically suggests that lesbian intimacy could improve cinematic storytelling, promoting a more inclusive lens.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a male protagonist's personal stagnation. Female characters, such as an ex-girlfriend and a co-worker, appear to be defined primarily by their relationships to the male lead.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative focuses on a localized setting with a likely homogeneous cast. There is no mention of racial blending or diverse casting within the protagonist's small-town framework.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques traditional success metrics and capitalist upward mobility. It utilizes philosophical observations to prioritize idiosyncratic, subjective morality over established social or religious norms.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the depiction of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health conditions in this work.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film presents a striking contrast between its progressive dialogue and its conventional narrative structure. While it uses character commentary to disrupt heteronormative expectations and critique capitalist values, the core story remains anchored in a traditional, male-centric framework. Diversity is strongest in its verbal engagement with LGBTQ+ themes, yet the film lacks meaningful racial or ethnic breadth. The characters appear to inhabit a homogeneous, localized environment that offers little representation of non-Anglo-Saxon identities. Ultimately, the work functions as a hybrid. It introduces subversive ideas through its characters' philosophical musings, but fails to translate that subversion into a diverse or non-traditional cast of characters.

2002

1998

2013

2009

2002

2008

1981

2017

1998

1992

1971

1997
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.