You are here:

Resurrection

Name: Resurrection
Director: Mikhail Shveitser
Released: 1960
Duration: 209 min

Representation Score

5.7/10

Fair

1960

Director

Mikhail Shveitser

Runtime

209 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Resurrection is a powerful critique of systemic inequality and institutional corruption. It challenges the moral authority of the Tsarist social hierarchy, replacing state-sanctioned justice with individual moral responsibility. The film achieves progressive value through its critique of class and state authority. Despite lacking modern demographic diversity, it highlights the ability to act of those underrepresented by systemic injustice. Ultimately, the narrative structure is designed to undermine trust in traditional institutions, emphasizing the need to dismantle oppressive social structures.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Resurrection have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight identities. The story focuses solely on the power dynamic between the male protagonist and the female lead.

How does Resurrection portray gender?

Good

The film explores gendered power dynamics by showing the impact of patriarchal structures on women. It questions the morality of the aristocracy through the lens of male guilt.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Resurrection?

Limited

Casting reflects the ethnic homogeneity of Tsarist Russia. Instead of racial diversity, the film uses class to highlight the divide between nobility and peasants.

How does Resurrection represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques institutional power, portraying the judicial system as corrupt and oppressive. Spiritual rebirth is shown as a personal journey rather than adherence to organized religion.

Does Resurrection include disability representation?

Fair

The film does not focus on physical or neurodivergent disabilities. Instead, it explores moral and psychological impairments, particularly the spiritual decay of the protagonist.

Present on Screen

Sophisticated critique of class and state authority.
Nuanced exploration of gendered power dynamics and patriarchal structures.
Effective deconstruction of corrupt, impersonal judicial and penal systems.

Limited or Absent

Lack of LGBTQ+ representation or non-straight identities.
Ethnic homogeneity reflecting the specific historical context of Tsarist Russia.
Absence of significant focus on physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Katusha, a country girl, is seduced and abandoned by Prince Nekludov. Nekludov finds himself, years later, on a jury trying the same Katusha for a crime he now realizes his actions drove her to. He follows her to imprisonment in Siberia, intent on redeeming her and himself as well.

How are these scores produced? →