You are here:
Treasure of Matecumbe

Treasure of Matecumbe

1976

G

Director

Vincent McEveety

Runtime

117 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In post-Civil War Kentucky, young David Burnic becomes the unexpected heir to the family secret, a map leading to buried treasure on the Florida isle of Matecumbe.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.3/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. There are no non-cisnormative identities or same-sex romantic arcs present in the narrative.

Gender Representation

Limited

Agency is primarily concentrated within male characters, driving the plot through male-centric action. Female characters remain secondary to the central quest and traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The ensemble cast is predominantly white, reflecting standard 1970s casting practices. There is a lack of significant characters of color with high agency.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story functions as a traditional swashbuckler focused on greed and wealth. It avoids systemic critiques, operating instead within a standard moral framework.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no visible inclusion of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The narrative does not engage with themes of chronic illness or neurodivergence.

Strengths

  • The film serves as a clear, archetypal example of 1970s Disney-style adventure storytelling.

Areas for Improvement

  • The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, remaining predominantly white.
  • Female characters lack agency, serving mostly secondary roles to the male protagonists.
  • There is a total absence of LGBTQ+ representation or neurodivergent characters.
  • The narrative reinforces traditional gender roles rather than subverting them.

AI Analysis

Treasure of Matecumbe is a quintessential mid-70s adventure film that relies heavily on established genre tropes. The narrative structure prioritizes a linear quest for wealth, which results in a highly homogeneous cast and predictable social dynamics. The film reinforces traditional hierarchies rather than challenging them. Masculinity is closely tied to leadership and physical exploration, while female and minority voices remain on the periphery of the central action. Ultimately, the production reflects the standard studio conventions of its era, offering a traditional experience that lacks intentionality regarding identity or systemic representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.