The Apprentice Heel
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Because, Because of a Woman
1963
Director
Michel Deville
Runtime
116 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A young man is a collector of feminine conquests. One morning, leaving one of his mistresses he is addressed by one of his past flirts. As revenge, she denounces him later to the police as the murderer of her fiance who was found dead the same morning. With the help of his mistresses and some new ones he makes on the road, the young man goes in search of the man he thinks is the killer, then his blond consort with whom he fell in love at the first sight the evening before.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.2/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses entirely on heteronormative romantic pursuits and obsessions. There is no presence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
A female character exerts significant agency by driving the plot through a calculated act of vengeance. However, the narrative remains anchored in the male protagonist's perspective.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is largely homogeneous, reflecting the social constraints of 1963 France. The film lacks a multicultural ensemble or diverse ethnic representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story explores moral relativism regarding fidelity and obsession. It functions as a character study rather than a critique of Western religious or capitalist institutions.
Disability Representation
No characters are defined by physical or neurodivergent impairments. There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed within the narrative.
Strengths
- The film disrupts traditional hierarchies by presenting a female character who exerts agency through vengeance.
- The narrative offers a nuanced look at female characters shifting from passive objects to plot drivers.
Areas for Improvement
- The cast is largely homogeneous, lacking multicultural or ethnic diversity.
- The narrative lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.
- There is no portrayal of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
AI Analysis
Michel Deville’s film is a period-specific character study that prioritizes psychological obsession over social representation. It centers on individualistic romantic volatility rather than systemic or identity-based exploration. While the film offers a nuanced look at female agency through retribution, it remains a product of its era. The narrative lacks the intersectional depth and demographic breadth found in contemporary cinema. The work functions primarily as a study of interpersonal dynamics, largely ignoring the broader social complexities of race, disability, or LGBTQ+ identities.
Similar Movies
A Cure for Love
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
The Con Artists
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Funny Money
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Arrivederci, Baby!
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
The Happy Thieves
1961
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Crooks in Clover
1963
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
A Touch of Larceny
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Le Cri du cormoran, le soir au-dessus des jonques
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Umbrella Coup
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Tender Scoundrel
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Be Beautiful and Shut Up
1958
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.