
Agenda: Grinding America Down
2010

1965
UnratedRuntime
31 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Centered around a vehement diatribe against pornography delivered by news reporter George Putnam, the film attempts to link explicit portrayals of human sexuality to the subversion and decline of American civilization, and briefly draws a parallel between pornography and Communist infiltration. Perversion for Profit illustrates its claims with still images taken from various softcore pornography magazines of the period-- though, 'sensitive' parts of the human anatomy have been obscured by colored bars. The film is in the public domain, and has become a popular download from the Prelinger Archives.
Overall Score
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film offers no meaningful depiction of LGBTQ+ identities. It treats sexual variance as a symptom of social decline rather than providing nuanced characterization.
Gender Representation
The narrative reinforces traditional gender hierarchies and conservative standards of modesty. It functions to police gender roles rather than subverting them.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film focuses on a monolithic view of American values. Its themes suggest a preoccupation with maintaining established Western and Anglo-Saxon social orders.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The documentary prioritizes traditional Western institutions and moral codes. It frames any departure from these established norms as a threat to the state.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible focus on disability or neurodivergence within the film's narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Perversion for Profit serves as a historical artifact of mid-century conservative social preservation. Rather than exploring diverse perspectives, the film is structured as a journalistic diatribe designed to defend the status quo against perceived moral and political decay. The documentary frames sexual and political deviation as a direct threat to the American national fabric. By linking pornography to Communist infiltration, it positions non-traditional behaviors as subversive elements that must be policed to maintain social stability. Ultimately, the film lacks any inclusive representation. It functions to reinforce traditional hierarchies and Western institutional norms, viewing any departure from these standards as a sign of systemic instability.

2010

1994

1992
1971

2016
2003

1983

1963

1987

1971

1995

2013
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.