Andy Goes Wild
1956

1934
PassedDirector
Charley Chase, Eddie Dunn
Runtime
19 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Betty's father has an invention that looks like a fancy camera; it emits an ultra-lavender ray that temporarily rids the ray's target of inhibitions. To test it, Betty's father zaps Charley hoping his newly-aberrant behavior will cause Betty to end her affections for the milquetoast. Dad's plan backfires: the invention works perfectly, Charley gets a backbone, and Betty loves her new forceful man. However, Charley's courage and lack of a superego get him in trouble with the law. He goes on trial for assaulting a bullying police officer. Is Charley going up the river leaving Betty high and dry?
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a traditional heterosexual courtship between Betty and Charley. No non-cisnormative identities or critiques of heteronormativity are present.
Gender Representation
The plot centers on a technological intervention to alter the male protagonist's submissive masculinity. While Charley gains a 'backbone,' Betty remains a traditional romantic interest.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative follows a homogeneous casting structure typical of 1930s mainstream comedy. There is no indication of racial blending or non-white majority casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story critiques traditional authority through a conflict with a bullying police officer. However, it remains rooted in conventional romantic and familial structures.
Disability Representation
The film provides no information regarding the depiction of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health conditions.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Another Wild Idea is a standard 1930s comedy that adheres to the social hierarchies and narrative conventions of its era. Its primary deviation from tradition is the brief subversion of masculine archetypes, transforming a passive lead into a forceful one via a sci-fi device. However, these shifts occur through slapstick situational humor rather than a deliberate deconstruction of systemic power. The narrative architecture reinforces conventional romantic goals and lacks the intersectional complexity needed for a higher score. Ultimately, the film functions as a period piece that prioritizes traditional courtship and comedic tropes over diverse representation.
1956

1934

1927

1926

1931

1914

1932

1930
1936
1934

1930

1944
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.