New Showbiz

You are here:
An Average Little Man

An Average Little Man

1977

Director

Mario Monicelli

Runtime

122 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A middle-aged government accountant is determined to secure a stable job for his son before retiring, willing to go to great lengths to achieve his goal.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.7/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film centers on the domestic and professional anxieties of a middle-aged man. It lacks explicit depictions of queer identities or narratives of liberation, remaining within traditional heteronormative structures.

Gender Representation

Fair

Women appear within the domestic sphere, though their agency is often mediated through the central male figure. The film avoids idealized tropes, offering a cynical realism regarding the nuclear family.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast and setting are largely homogeneous, reflecting the specific socio-economic context of 1970s Italy. The narrative does not prioritize a multicultural or intersectional lens.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film provides a sharp critique of middle-class stability and Western institutional values. It portrays the pursuit of social standing as a descent into moral relativism and systemic corruption.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities driving the narrative or serving as central thematic elements.

Strengths

  • Aggressively challenges the sanctity of traditional middle-class morality.
  • Provides a profound deconstruction of Western bureaucratic systems and institutional stability.
  • Avoids idealized domestic tropes by presenting a cynical, realistic view of family life.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of non-cisnormative or LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Features a largely homogeneous cast with minimal racial or ethnic diversity.
  • Female agency is often secondary to the central male protagonist's journey.

AI Analysis

Mario Monicelli’s film is a biting sociological critique that prioritizes class and institutional corruption over demographic breadth. It succeeds as a subversive satire, deconstructing the moral decay of the middle class and the hollow nature of bureaucratic careerism. However, the film is limited by its narrow demographic focus. It lacks meaningful representation of LGBTQ+ identities and racial diversity, remaining rooted in a homogeneous Italian social landscape. While it challenges social hierarchies, it does so through a very specific, localized lens. Ultimately, the work trades demographic inclusivity for deep thematic subversion. It is a study of systemic corruption rather than a diverse tapestry of human experience.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film

Similar Movies

Movie poster for The Tiger and the Pussycat

The Tiger and the Pussycat

1967

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.