You are here:
The Strange Life of Dr. Frankenstein

The Strange Life of Dr. Frankenstein

2018

PG

Director

Jean Froment

Runtime

53 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In 1818, Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, a powerful and timelessness novel which eternal theme is nothing other than man's quest for the secret of life. Since then, the Creature became a pop culture icon, overshadowing the novel and Doctor Frankenstein himself.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.4/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The documentary lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or romantic intimacy. While it may touch upon Romantic-era social structures, there is no deliberate focus on non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film centers on Mary Shelley’s intellectual legacy. By elevating her agency, the production disrupts traditional hierarchies that often relegate female creators to the periphery of literary history.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The narrative focuses on a 19th-century European literary context. It remains centered on Western traditions without documented evidence of diverse ethnic perspectives or race-bent casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques the hubris of traditional scientific authority through the 'Modern Prometheus' theme. It examines the Creature as a figure misunderstood by systemic structures and institutional progress.

Disability Representation

Fair

The subject matter intersects with themes of bodily autonomy and physical difference. However, the film lacks explicit neurodivergent or disability-led narratives within its documentary format.

Strengths

  • Centers Mary Shelley as a primary intellectual force.
  • Critiques traditional scientific authority and institutional hubris.
  • Explores the deconstruction of the creator archetype.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks diverse ethnic perspectives within the historical framework.
  • Provides minimal representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Fails to include explicit disability-led narratives.

AI Analysis

The documentary serves as a historical retrospective on Mary Shelley’s literary impact. It succeeds in centering a female intellectual figure, providing a necessary correction to male-dominated scientific histories. However, the film is constrained by its Eurocentric subject matter. The focus on 19th-century Western literary traditions limits the inclusion of diverse racial and ethnic perspectives. While the themes of the Creature touch upon bodily difference, the film lacks active representation of disability or LGBTQ+ identities, remaining a strictly educational historical account.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.