You are here:

Safer at Home

Safer at Home

Representation Score

5.5/10

Fair

2021

R

Director

Will Wernick

Runtime

82 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Safer at Home successfully normalizes non-traditional identities by incorporating LGBTQ+ relationships into the story without relying on outdated clichés. The film explores social fragmentation during a global crisis using a screenlife format, offering a progressive thematic profile through its skepticism of state-mandated order. While the film presents a diverse cast across multiple cities, the depth of racialized character arcs remains secondary to the central supernatural threat. The focus on collective dysfunction occasionally obscures individual ability to act across gender lines. Ultimately, the film examines social atomization. It challenges traditional moral views of social disorder, presenting it as a response to systemic instability and the erosion of traditional safety nets.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Safer at Home have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film challenges traditional expectations by focusing on same-sex romantic relationships as a regular part of the story. Ben and Liam are part of the plot without being made into a spectacle.

How does Safer at Home portray gender?

Fair

Female characters face high-stress decisions and physical danger, avoiding the damsel-in-distress cliché. However, the emphasis on collective dysfunction sometimes overshadows individual ability to act.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Safer at Home?

Fair

The cast includes a variety of performers, such as Adwin Brown and Brandon Morales, and the narrative avoids a white-centric viewpoint by spreading characters across different urban settings.

How does Safer at Home represent religion and culture?

Good

The story questions the effectiveness of Western institutions by depicting the setting as a police state. Social deviance is shown as a symptom of a fragmented society.

Does Safer at Home include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no explicit evidence regarding the portrayal of visible or invisible disabilities within the film.

Present on Screen

  • Normalizes queer identities by integrating same-sex couples into the plot without making them a spectacle.
  • Avoids the damsel cliché by placing female characters in high-stress, high-stakes decision-making roles.
  • Uses a multi-city setting to avoid a homogeneous, white-centric perspective.

Limited or Absent

  • Individual ability to act across gender lines is somewhat diluted by the focus on collective group dysfunction.
  • Specific depth regarding racialized character arcs is secondary to the central horror elements.
  • There is no visible representation of disability within the narrative.

Official Synopsis

Two years into the pandemic, a group of friends throw an online party with a night of games, drinking and drugs. After taking an ecstasy pill, things go terribly wrong and the safety of their home becomes more terrifying than the raging chaos outside.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.