You are here:

Antisocial

Antisocial

Representation Score

3.9/10

Limited

2013

R

Director

Cody Calahan

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Antisocial is a genre-driven survival thriller that prioritizes psychological dread and atmospheric tension over social commentary. The narrative structure revolves around a tight-knit group of university students facing a global epidemic, keeping the focus narrow and localized. Operating within traditional horror frameworks, the film misses opportunities to engage with identity politics or systemic hierarchies. Characters are defined by their immediate response to chaos rather than their social or cultural backgrounds. Ultimately, the film functions as a conventional piece of indie horror. It explores the breakdown of information and social order through a lens of paranoia rather than through a diverse or multi-layered perspective.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Antisocial have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not depict any non-binary or LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships. It follows conventional interpersonal dynamics typical of survival thrillers.

How does Antisocial portray gender?

Fair

Characters follow standard ensemble roles without challenging traditional gender hierarchies. The focus is on primal survival instincts rather than exploring gender power structures.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Antisocial?

Limited

The story centers on a small group of friends without prioritizing non-white perspectives. It avoids exploring systemic power dynamics or the intersection of race and other identities.

How does Antisocial represent religion and culture?

Limited

The breakdown of societal norms serves the horror genre's isolation cliché rather than critiquing specific institutions. There is no proactive examination of morality or religion.

Does Antisocial include disability representation?

Limited

No visible or invisible disabilities are addressed within the character arcs. The plot focuses on physical survival rather than neurodivergent or chronic illness narratives.

Present on Screen

  • The film effectively uses the isolation cliché to create high-tension, character-driven survival scenarios.
  • It successfully delves into the psychological descent into paranoia during a crisis.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and non-traditional gender expressions.
  • There is a missed opportunity to include diverse racial, ethnic, or disability-related perspectives.
  • The story adheres to traditional genre conventions rather than subverting established social hierarchies.

Official Synopsis

Five university friends gather at a house party to ring in the New Year. Unbeknownst to them, an epidemic has erupted outside, causing outbreaks around the world. With nowhere else to turn, they barricade themselves indoors with only their phones, laptops, and other tech devices. They use their devices to research the possible cause of this outbreak. Information and video footage over flow their computers as they descend further into the cause and the ensuing chaos. As the virus spreads, the mood in the house changes from fear to paranoia. Who is safe? Who can they trust? Reality becomes blurred as they slowly discover the source of the virus causing the sickness...and there is no going back.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.