You are here:

The Three Stooges Follies

The Three Stooges Follies

Representation Score

2.4/10

Limited

1974

G

Director

Del Lord, Jules White, Charley Chase, Harry Edwards, Lambert Hillyer, Ted Collins

Runtime

106 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This compilation serves as a historical archive of mid-century American comedy. The content reflects the era's limited demographic representation and reliance on established social hierarchies. The shorts prioritize situational physical comedy and traditional slapstick clichés, reinforcing conventional narrative expectations like male-driven chaos and secondary female roles. Ultimately, the work offers a window into early Hollywood's comedic standards but lacks the storytelling that reflects multiple aspects of identity and ability to act necessary to meet modern diversity benchmarks.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Three Stooges Follies have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives that challenge traditional gender roles and relationships. The shorts rely on humor that assumes everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does The Three Stooges Follies portray gender?

Limited

Male characters drive the action, often through physical clumsiness. Female characters usually have secondary, domestic, or reactionary roles without much independence.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Three Stooges Follies?

Minimal

The casting and characterizations follow the homogeneous standards of early Hollywood. There is no multi-layered casting or diverse ethnic representation.

How does The Three Stooges Follies represent religion and culture?

Limited

The collection follows traditional Western comedic structures. The stories generally uphold established social norms and traditional structures of authority.

Does The Three Stooges Follies include disability representation?

Minimal

Humor often comes from physical frailty or perceived cognitive issues. Using the 'buffoon' archetype for disabled characters doesn't respect progressive representation.

Present on Screen

  • Includes historical satire in segments like 'You Nazty Spy!' to critique specific political regimes.
  • Offers a variety of comedic styles, from Three Stooges slapstick to Batman serial action.

Limited or Absent

  • The collection lacks multi-layered casting and diverse ethnic representation.
  • Female characters lack independent ability to act, often serving merely as foils to male protagonists.
  • The reliance on 'buffoon' archetypes undermines progressive disability representation.

Official Synopsis

Released to theaters in 1974, this collection of vintage Columbia short subjects included: "Yes, We Have No Bonanza" with The Three Stooges; "Violent Is the Word for Curly" with The Three Stooges; "You Nazty Spy!" with The Three Stooges (replaced by "Men in Black" for the nontheatrical reissue); "Nothing But Pleasure" with Buster Keaton; "Strife of the Party" with Vera Vague; Chapter 1 of the 1943 "Batman" serial with Lewis Wilson and Douglas Croft; and "America Sings with Kate Smith."

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.