You are here:

Zombies: A Living History

Zombies: A Living History

Representation Score

6.1/10

Good

2011

Director

David V. Nicholson

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Zombies: A Living History functions primarily as an educational and anthropological survey. It succeeds in moving beyond Anglo-centric storytelling by validating diverse cultural mythologies and global folklore. However, the film lacks character-driven social commentary. Because the focus is on medical history and academic inquiry, it misses opportunities to explore specific social identities or control over the story. Ultimately, the documentary provides a moderate approach to diversity. It offers a broad cross-cultural scope but lacks the narrative depth required for explicit representation of gender or LGBTQ+ identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Zombies: A Living History have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The documentary focuses on historical diseases and cultural folklore. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-straight relationships.

How does Zombies: A Living History portray gender?

Fair

The film explores global phenomena and biological history. There is no indication of a deliberate subversion of traditional gender roles or a focus on gender-specific control over the story.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Zombies: A Living History?

Good

The narrative engages with non-Western perspectives by examining how different cultures create their own versions of zombies. This global approach validates the folklore of various ethnic groups.

How does Zombies: A Living History represent religion and culture?

Fair

The work avoids a singular Western viewpoint by exploring how different cultures interpret the same phenomenon. It prioritizes scientific and historical inquiry over moralistic frameworks.

Does Zombies: A Living History include disability representation?

Fair

The exploration of diseases mimicking zombie behavior touches upon themes of neurological or physical impairment. It remains unclear if these conditions are portrayed with real power or as clichés.

Present on Screen

  • The anthropological scope provides meaningful engagement with non-Western perspectives and diverse cultural mythologies.
  • The global approach avoids a purely Western-centric lens by examining how various cultures interpret the zombie archetype.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks character-driven control over the story and explicit narratives regarding social identities.
  • There is a notable absence of representation for LGBTQ+ and gender-specific narratives.

Official Synopsis

Zombies: are they real? Every culture creates its own version of a zombie. There have been diseases in history that have mimicked behavior of a zombie virus. The plausibility is there. You would never be up against one zombie.you would be up against thousands or millions of zombies. How would you survive?

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.