
HyperNormalisation
2016

2011
Not RatedDirector
Peter Joseph
Runtime
161 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A presentation of a case for a needed transition out of the current socioeconomic monetary paradigm which governs the entire world society. This subject matter will transcend the issues of cultural relativism and traditional ideology and move to relate the core, empirical 'life ground' attributes of human and social survival, extrapolating those immutable natural laws into a new sustainable social paradigm called a 'Resource-Based Economy'.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary does not center on LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives. It avoids derogatory depictions but lacks the intentionality to critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The film maintains a neutral stance regarding gender hierarchies. By focusing on abstract economic models, it remains largely indifferent to gender dynamics and interpersonal roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Global perspectives are used to illustrate the impact of current economic structures. The narrative touches on post-colonial themes of exploitation without centering specific racial identities.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a rigorous critique of capitalism, banking, and government. It promotes a transition toward a resource-based economy that challenges traditional Western institutions.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible focus on neurodivergence, physical disability, or mental health. The subject matter remains strictly centered on socioeconomic theory.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Zeitgeist: Moving Forward operates as an ideological manifesto rather than a character-driven narrative. Its primary purpose is the deconstruction of global socioeconomic paradigms through a systemic lens. The film excels in cultural representation by challenging the status quo and dismantling traditional Western authority. It advocates for a scientific, resource-based restructuring of society. However, the work lacks intentionality regarding identity-based representation. It remains largely indifferent to gender, disability, and LGBTQ+ narratives, focusing instead on macro-economic frameworks.

2016

2014

2008

2015

2006

2009

2016

2017

2010

2015

2019

2003
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.