Up the Academy
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Army Game
1960
Director
Claude de Givray
Runtime
87 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Jean Lerat begins his military service at an army camp. Despite his aunt’s attempts to pull a few strings to his advantage, the unfortunate Lerat manages to get on the wrong side of his bullying colonel…
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.9/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity. It appears to follow standard 1960s comedic conventions.
Gender Representation
The story focuses on male military service and patriarchal hierarchies. While an aunt appears, she serves the male protagonist's journey rather than subverting gender roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting reflects the homogeneous social structures of mid-century France. There is no evidence of diverse ethnic ensembles or race-bent casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The conflict is character-driven rather than a systemic critique of institutions. Family roles, such as the aunt, function as traditional support mechanisms.
Disability Representation
There is no indication of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.
Strengths
- Provides a clear, character-driven conflict between an underdog and an institutional authority figure.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks intersectional complexity and diverse representation across gender, race, and identity.
- Relies on traditional mid-century social structures rather than subverting institutional norms.
AI Analysis
The film operates as a traditional situational comedy centered on the friction between an individual and a rigid military hierarchy. The narrative focuses on the personal struggles of Jean Lerat against a bullying colonel, following standard underdog tropes. Because the production dates to 1960, it adheres to the homogeneous social and cultural structures of that era. The film lacks intersectional complexity or diverse casting, focusing instead on interpersonal conflict within a male-dominated environment. Ultimately, the work functions as a period-typical comedy that does not attempt to subvert social norms or provide representation for marginalized groups.
Similar Movies
The Sad Sack
1957
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Toto the Sheik
1950
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
The Major's Guard
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
4 Crazy Draftees at the Army
1974
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Vääpeli Körmy ja marsalkan sauva
1990
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
The Gay Deceivers
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
The Rookie
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
With Love and Hisses
1927
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
The Gendarme in New York
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
School for Scoundrels
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
The Eight-Forty-Seven Train
1934
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.