You are here:

That Lovely Girl

That Lovely Girl

Representation Score

8.3/10

Excellent

2014

Director

Keren Yedaya

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Keren Yedaya’s work excels in social realism, particularly through its critique of institutional stability. The film portrays underrepresented identities with significant influence and challenges traditional cultural narratives about the nuclear family and state support. However, the film lacks explicit representation for LGBTQ+ identities and specific clinical disabilities. These omissions prevent a higher score in those specific categories, as the narrative focus remains strictly on socioeconomic and interpersonal struggles. Ultimately, the film is a powerful study of systemic inequality. It uses its setting to provide a multi-ethnic perspective that avoids the homogeneity often found in mainstream media.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does That Lovely Girl have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not prominently feature LGBTQ+ identities. There is no significant evidence of non-traditional gender expressions among the main characters.

How does That Lovely Girl portray gender?

Good

The narrative focuses on the female experience, exploring the role of women under extreme conditions. It challenges conventional power hierarchies by highlighting the instability and conflict in complex, often violent, power dynamics.

How racially and ethnically diverse is That Lovely Girl?

Good

The film presents a nuanced, multi-ethnic urban landscape. By focusing on underprivileged socioeconomic groups, it avoids depicting a homogeneous or privileged demographic, reflecting a diverse, lived reality.

How does That Lovely Girl represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story critiques established socioeconomic structures, portraying the nuclear family and state stability as fractured. It frames survivalist behaviors as logical responses to an oppressive economic environment.

Does That Lovely Girl include disability representation?

Fair

There is no explicit focus on visible or neurodivergent disabilities. The film instead explores the psychological impact and mental strain caused by living in a high-stress, precarious environment.

Present on Screen

  • Strong focus on the female experience and ability to act within vulnerable landscapes.
  • Nuanced portrayal of a multi-ethnic, underrepresented urban environment.
  • Sophisticated critique of how systemic poverty fractures traditional social institutions.

Limited or Absent

  • Lack of significant representation for LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional gender expressions.
  • Absence of explicit focus on visible or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Moshe and Tami are a couple, Moshe is in his fifties and Tami is in her early twenties. They live together in a cruel and violent relationship, from which Tami seems unable to set herself free. Tami and Moshe are father and daughter...

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.