You are here:

Bookies

Name: Bookies
Director: Mark Illsley
Released: 2003
Duration: 88 min

Representation Score

2.5/10

Limited

2003

Director

Mark Illsley

Runtime

88 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Bookies is a conventional crime-comedy that sticks closely to the genre clichés of the early 2000s. The narrative is driven by a homogeneous group of male characters, focusing on themes of greed and organized crime rather than social commentary. The film lacks complexity in representing different aspects of identity and fails to challenge established social hierarchies. It relies on traditional masculine archetypes and standard moral trajectories regarding law and order. Since the story centers on a localized social circle without evidence of diverse casting or identity-driven roles, it remains a product of its era's mainstream conventions.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Bookies have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisgender identities. It follows a standard storyline typical of early-2000s crime comedies.

How does Bookies portray gender?

Fair

The story revolves around a male-dominated social circle. Male characters drive the plot through greed and risk-taking, reinforcing traditional masculine roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Bookies?

Limited

The narrative focuses on a specific group of college friends. It seems to follow conventional casting patterns of its era, likely centering on a homogeneous demographic.

How does Bookies represent religion and culture?

Limited

The film serves as a cautionary tale about individual morality and crime. It does not use post-colonial or anti-capitalist frameworks to critique Western institutions.

Does Bookies include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no information about the inclusion of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Present on Screen

The film offers a clear, genre-focused cautionary tale about the dangers of illegal enterprise and individual greed.

Limited or Absent

The narrative lacks LGBTQ+ representation and non-cisgender identities.
The plot is heavily male-dominated, reinforcing traditional gender roles.
There is no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity beyond conventional casting patterns.
The film lacks cultural critique or frameworks that challenge Western institutions.

Official Synopsis

Four college friends become small-time bookies, only to find their world spinning dangerously out of control when their greed attracts the attention of organized crime.

How are these scores produced? →