Fourteen Days in May
1987
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.4 out of 10
You are here:
The Last Judgement
Representation Score
4.5/10
Fair
1987
Director
Herz Frank
Runtime
68 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
The Last Judgement is a psychological study of an individual facing a death sentence. It prioritizes humanistic, subjective experience over demographic breadth, making it a localized ethnographic work rather than a diverse ensemble piece. While the film lacks markers of LGBTQ+ or racial diversity, it offers a critique of institutional power. It challenges the infallibility of the state by focusing on the emotional disintegration of a man caught in its machinery. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its stylistic departure from objective documentary formats, though it remains centered on a traditional, male-centric narrative structure.
Category Breakdown
Does The Last Judgement have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film does not include explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It focuses on a legal and emotional crisis rather than exploring non-straight relationships or identities.
How does The Last Judgement portray gender?
The story centers around a male protagonist facing a terminal legal outcome. It reinforces traditional masculine traits of stoicism rather than challenging gender norms.
How racially and ethnically diverse is The Last Judgement?
As a Latvian production, the cast likely reflects the local population of the time. The film functions as a study of a specific national identity within its local context.
How does The Last Judgement represent religion and culture?
The film critiques the rigidity of state legal institutions through a subjective lens. It prioritizes the individual's experience over the absolute morality of the state.
Does The Last Judgement include disability representation?
There is insufficient evidence to determine if neurodivergence or mental health conditions are portrayed with ability to act. The film explores psychological distress but lacks specific disability markers.
Present on Screen
- Challenges the perceived infallibility of state legal institutions.
- Provides a subjective, humanistic lens on justice and individual truth.
- Offers a nuanced psychological study of a man in crisis.
Limited or Absent
- Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
- Maintains a traditional, male-centric narrative focus.
- Shows little evidence of racial or gender-based subversion.
Official Synopsis
A man is facing a trial for murdering a Latvian union leader, which more likely than not will end with a death sentence. A close-up look at his emotional journey through the trial, imprisonment and beyond.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
The Fear of 13
2015
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.8 out of 10
Lindy Lou, Juror Number 2
2017
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.3 out of 10
The Central Park Five
2012
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.0 out of 10
An Eye for an Eye
2016
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.1 out of 10
Into the Abyss
2011
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.5 out of 10
The Trial
2018
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.5 out of 10
Murder to Mercy: The Cyntoia Brown Story
2020
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.