You are here:

Hysteria

Hysteria

Representation Score

7.0/10

Good

2011

R

Director

Tanya Wexler

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Hysteria is a revisionist comedy that deconstructs the medicalization of the female body. By focusing on the invention of the vibrator, the film shifts power from a patriarchal establishment to female subjects, granting them significant physical and intellectual control. However, the film's impact is limited by its narrow demographic scope. The historical context restricts the narrative to a predominantly white and heterosexual framework, lacking diverse racial and LGBTQ+ representation. Overall, the film is a strong critique of institutional control and gendered repression, though it remains limited in its broader social representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Hysteria have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on heterosexual relationships and lacks significant depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or queer narratives. It does not include characters with diverse sexual orientations or gender identities.

How does Hysteria portray gender?

Excellent

The narrative challenges the era's view of women as passive patients by showing women taking control of their bodies and lives. It highlights their intellect and autonomy, subverting the traditional gender roles of the time.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Hysteria?

Limited

The cast is predominantly white, reflecting the demographic homogeneity of Victorian England. The film does not feature characters from diverse racial or ethnic backgrounds.

How does Hysteria represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques the rigid social and religious norms of Victorian society, emphasizing the importance of bodily autonomy and scientific progress over traditionalist doctrines.

Does Hysteria include disability representation?

Fair

The story critiques how medical institutions historically diagnosed and treated 'hysteria' among women. However, it does not provide nuanced portrayals of characters with contemporary physical or neurodevelopmental disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Empowers female subjects by challenging traditional gender roles.
  • Critiques Victorian medical and social institutions effectively.
  • Highlights the historical pathologization of female biology and autonomy.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks significant representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer narratives.
  • Shows minimal racial and ethnic diversity within the historical setting.
  • Does not offer nuanced portrayals of characters with contemporary disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Two doctors in Victorian England use manual stimulation of female genitalia to cure their patients' ills, leading to the invention of the vibrator.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.